As most of us are aware, local father Kaylub Giamanco became an accidental household name when he witnessed 16-year-old Griffin J. John II firing at a vehicle outside Silver Rail Elementary and made the split-second decision to give chase.
Rushing into the building with a legally secured handgun from his truck, Giamanco confronted the shooter inside the special needs classroom and fatally shot him, bringing an abrupt end to a massacre that had already claimed four lives. Naturally, that dramatic intervention has sent shockwaves through the local community and touched off a predictable rush for locals to strap up.
I have zero personal animosity toward Mr. Giamanco, because he acted out of genuine panic and a desperate desire to protect children, and he prevented further bloodshed. Even so, the brutal truth is that he simply got lucky.
Chaos reigns supreme during an active school shooting, meaning that compounding the violence with extra firearms in the hands of untrained civilians is a recipe for absolute disaster. Shootouts in a crowded hallway full of panicking children multiply the risks of strays hitting innocent bystanders. And police entering a chaotic crime scene cannot magically distinguish between the active threat and a well-meaning neighbor holding a pistol, potentially turning a supposed good guy with a gun into a dead guy with a gun in fractions of a second.
Beyond the physical dangers of vigilante gunplay, we conveniently ignore the profound psychological fallout carried by anyone who actually pulls the trigger. Unless you’re a sociopath, that’s something that can affect your mental health for the rest of your life.
Piling more firearms onto a society already drowning in weaponry accomplishes nothing except padding gun manufacturer profits and manufacturing a false sense of security. Trying to cure the epidemic of gun violence by adding more guns to the mix is quite literally like trying to cure cancer with more cancer.
(Source)
Leave a Reply